Considerations for development of therapies for cutaneous neurofibroma

SK Verma, VM Riccardi, SR Plotkin, H Weinberg… - Neurology, 2018 - AAN Enterprises
SK Verma, VM Riccardi, SR Plotkin, H Weinberg, RR Anderson, JO Blakeley, K Jarnagin
Neurology, 2018AAN Enterprises
Objective The only therapies currently available for cutaneous neurofibromas (cNF) are
procedural. The goals of the Therapies Development Working Group were to (1) summarize
currently available treatment options for cNF,(2) define key considerations for drug discovery
and development generally, and specifically for cNF, and (3) outline recommendations for
the successful development of medical therapies for cNF. Methods The subgroup reviewed
published and unpublished data on procedural, drug/device, and medical treatment …
Objective
The only therapies currently available for cutaneous neurofibromas (cNF) are procedural. The goals of the Therapies Development Working Group were to (1) summarize currently available treatment options for cNF, (2) define key considerations for drug discovery and development generally, and specifically for cNF, and (3) outline recommendations for the successful development of medical therapies for cNF.
Methods
The subgroup reviewed published and unpublished data on procedural, drug/device, and medical treatment approaches utilized for cNFs via literature search. The team defined disease- and patient-specific factors to consider for therapies development in a series of consensus meetings.
Results
The team identified 5 approaches entailing procedural and drug/device methods currently under study. There have been 4 clinical studies exploring various interventional therapies, from which outcomes were highly variable. The team identified 4 key factors to prioritize during the development of products for the treatment for cNF: safety, anatomic distribution of cNF, numbers of tumors to be treated, and route of administration.
Conclusions
The number, size, and distribution of cNF is highly variable among patients with NF1 and it is possible that different phenotypes will require different drug development paths. The nonfatal nature of the disease and relatively limited patient numbers suggest that for any product to have a higher likelihood of acceptance, it will have to (1) demonstrate an effect that is clinically meaningful, (2) have a safety profile conducive to long-term dosing, and (3) have a low manufacturing cost.
American Academy of Neurology